Use case
LiveFour documents. One current record.
An amendment changes a section without restating it, so the rule in force today is spread across the whole set. Covenance resolves the set into the current language and names what it superseded.
The problem
A declaration recorded in 1998, bylaws from 2004, rules adopted in 2024, and a 2019 amendment that quietly rewrote the fence height limit. Nothing in the set announces which text is live. Answering correctly means reading all four in recording order and holding the supersession chain in your head — which is why the same question gets different answers from different people on the same team.
What Covenance does
Each section is indexed against the amendments that modified it, so the searched text is the operative text. An answer returns the language in force, the section it comes from, and the article it superseded — the fence answer cites Amendment 3 §2 and says outright that it replaced the six-foot limit in CC&Rs Article IX §3. The reconciliation is the product.
- The corpus
- The document set as it exists. No cleanup, no tagging, no restructuring before you send it.
- What resolves
- Amendments, restatements, and adopted rules that modify an earlier section, in recording order.
- What you get back
- The current language, cited to section, with the superseded provision named beside it.
Send us the document set.
Fifteen minutes, and you'll see Covenance searching your own documents — including the questions it refuses.
Book a 15-minute call